SEMANTICS


Assalamu'alaikum. Hello guys!!! We have another topic today. Yes, we will study about 'semantic'. What is semantic? What are the examples of semantic? Is it related to syntax? If you wanna know more. Please find out on this link https://drive.google.com/file/d/12VVvrTpyof9bXvQwgVntkrxnNHBzMjLv/view?usp=drivesdk.

Have you finished it? I think you've read it. Now, please ask me if you have any question about semantic. I'll explain to you according to experts' explanation and according to me. Thank you for reading my blog.

Komentar

Yolanda Ramadhan mengatakan…
hi sikin, I think its not complate. but no problem
I have a question to u,u say semantics is a lexical study of meaning, so my question is what meant by 'meaning' in this semantic itself?
thanks
Sikin Nuratika mengatakan…
In semantics, meaning is the message conveyed by words, sentences, and symbols in a context. Also called lexical meaning or semantic meaning.

In The Evolution of Language (2010), W. Tecumseh Fitch points out that semantics is "the branch of language study that consistently rubs shoulders with philosophy. This is because the study of meaning raises a host of deep problems that are the traditional stomping grounds for philosophers." For example
The apple eats you. It is well-structured in lexical meaning. But, in semantic meaning, the sentence is very odd. So, the semantic take a part in this case.
Yolanda Ramadhan mengatakan…
Ok if you draw conclusions from expert W. Tecumseh Fitch, there explains that the study of meaning raises a host of deep problems that are the traditional stomping grounds for philosophers ". my question is to what extent it becomes a linguistic problem? thankyou
Sikin Nuratika mengatakan…
Thanks for your question. However, over the years, applied linguistics has proved to be a diverse and dynamic field and has expanded dramatically and has developed its own metalanguages and bodies of theory which inform it to the point where linguistics and applied linguistics are largely separate and unrelated disciplines. It is now not only possible but likely that an applied linguist does not have linguistic training - and vice versa. So it is not the case that one is prior to the other (except historically).The mangoes drink the stove. It is well-structured in lexical meaning. But, in semantic meaning, the sentence is very odd. It is impossible for mangoes to drink the stove. So, the semantic take a part in this case. It becomes a linguistic problem if we couldn't applied the semantic meaning in this case. If you know the semantic meaning, then you can analyze what people are trying to say to you.
Veronica Saragi mengatakan…
So, how we can understand that is semantic or pragmatic, Sikin? As we know, semantic and pragmatic is the study about language. So, what is the specifically differences about both of them?
Sikin Nuratika mengatakan…
Thanks for the questions. both the pragmatic and semantic meaning of your sentence are important when communicating with other people. Although semantics is concerned only with the exact, literal meaning of the words and their interrelations, pragmatic usage focuses on the inferred meaning that the speakers and listeners perceive.

The following examples demonstrate the difference between the two:

She hasn’t taken a shower.

He was so tired he could sleep for days.

In both of these examples, the context and pragmatic meaning really define the sentence.

In the first, did the speaker really mean to say that the woman has not ever taken a shower, not even once? Although the sentence says just that, the listener in the conversation may understand, based on other factors, that the speaker means that the woman they are referring to has not taken a shower … today.

In the second example, we have a guy who is so tired he can sleep for days. Is he really going to sleep for days? Semantically, we would need to take that sentence to mean exactly that. But, in casual conversation, the listeners and speaker might tell you that the guy was just saying he was really, really tired, and using those words to convey that meaning, instead of saying, ‘he was really tired.
Rohandi Yusuf mengatakan…
Explain, why semantics have an important role in teaching language, including teaching English as a foreign language?
Yolanda Ramadhan mengatakan…
sorry, I think your answer does not connect with my question. I ask to u what extent it becomes a linguistic problem? Or u can you explain clearly again with your explanation before?
Sikin Nuratika mengatakan…
I think it connected with your questions. Please read carefully and try to understand word by word, sentence by sentence. If you ask me about the extent of semantics meaning. Of course all the sentences have their own meaning, but they will be analyzed by semantics meaning.Linguistic semantics has been defined as the study of how languages organize and express meanings.

"Oddly," says R.L. Trask, "some of the most important work in semantics was being done from the late 19th century onwards by philosophers [rather than by linguists]." Over the past 50 years, however, "approaches to semantics have proliferated, and the subject is now one of the liveliest areas in linguistics." All the the study of how languages organize and express meanings will be analyzed by semantics meaning. That's the extent of a linguitics problem that we can solve by using semantics meaning. Thank you.
Sikin Nuratika mengatakan…
Thanks for the question. Semantics knowledge is one of the most important element that should had by the teacher when they want to teaching English to their students in the class, and I think as the good teacher I should apply my semantics knowledge to teach them exactly to improving their language skill. As we know our students has different background, and it must be different culture also. So, we can show that from the difference itself.
And then, it is important to apply of semantics knowledge in teaching English to school students because the students not only learning about speaking but also all of the language skills, such as listening, reading and writing, so they must be active and creative in getting their language ability. We talk start from reading, the students should know and make a comprehending of the information that they have found after they read some sentences or paragraph. If they do not know what the meaning of the word, and how they can identify sentence by sentence, it will be difficult for them. The second, in writing students required to write some sentences or paragraph in good constructions, if they want to have or produce a good writing. The students should know how to choice or use the word that suitable based on the context. And the last, it is about listening. In listening comprehension students should know many of vocabulary and how the people pronounced the word, because in English there are so many words that have the same sound, and it needs more explanation from the teacher. This thing needs the role of the teacher in guiding the students to get the good result. And to be the guider or teacher you have to apply your ability or knowledge especially semantics knowledge. The teacher should teach their students to find the suitable meaning of the word when they are in reading the text. The teacher should guide their students.
Maya Yolanda mengatakan…
Komentar ini telah dihapus oleh pengarang.
Siti Zaituni mengatakan…
understanding of words through signs or symbols that are developed into meaning and produce levels of language analysis" you know, not anyone allow to understand what the meaning in conversation.
Veronica Saragi mengatakan…
Hi sist sikin, thank you for your nice blog. I want to ask you what are the most efficient methids to know the semantic sentences or praatic senteces?
Sikin Nuratika mengatakan…
Hello Siti! thank you for your statement. not anyone allow to understand what the meaning in conversation.
your statement is not entirely correct. because of that statement, we shoul learn about semantics and pragmatics studies to add our insight about how to communicate well with each other. if we know semantics and pragmatics, it will be easy for us to understand what we want to utter and what someone tell to us. thank you.
Sikin Nuratika mengatakan…
hello Vero! thanks for your question. according to Kent Bach, The distinction between semantics and pragmatics is easier to apply than to explain. Explaining it is complicated by the fact that many conflicting formulations have been proposed over the past sixty years. This might suggest that there is no one way of drawing the distinction and that how to draw it is merely a terminological question, a matter of arbitrary stipulation. In my view, though, these diverse formulations, despite their conflicts, all shed light on the distinction as it is commonly applied, in both linguistics and philosophy. Although it is generally clear what is at issue when people apply the distinction to specific linguistic phenomena, what is less clear, in some cases anyway, is whether a given phenomenon is semantic or pragmatic, or both. Fortunately, there are other phenomena that are uncontroversially semantic or, as the case may be, uncontroversially pragmatic. Their example will help us get clear on what the semantics-pragmatics distinction is.

for me, the method is to learn both of these studies and you will know how to differentiate between pragmatics sentences and semantics sentences. actually, it is easy to differentiate for someone who has learned about pragmatics and semantics. because pragmatics sentences usually used metaphor words and the meaning is not the same with the true meaning. while semantics sentences usually used the straight words with the straight meaning of the words in sentences. thank you.
Lia Silveria Sinaga mengatakan…
hi sist sikin 👋 I am Lia silveria sinaga 😊 I have seen your blog and also seen your explanation but I did not find anything interesting there 😑😑 and what else do you want to see? but I also can't explain the link and the link 🙈. so how can i give a question? is it only me who feels like that 🙈🙈 oh my god 😑😑
Lia Silveria Sinaga mengatakan…
Komentar ini telah dihapus oleh pengarang.
Maya Yolanda mengatakan…
hello kak sikin, i want to ask you. From the perspective of semantics, how is semantics' understanding of the indirect speech act?
Sikin Nuratika mengatakan…
Indirect speech in perspective of semantics is one of the ways or types to convey the utterances without tell someone to do something. Thank you.
Fransiska Gan mengatakan…
Wow. I like the way you answer the question Sikin. It's full and completed explanation. And you have commitment too to answer the questions. Keep giving interesting comment Sikin.
Sikin Nuratika mengatakan…
Hello Lia! What do you mean by how can you give me questions? I think that you have no question at all because you do not care what I want to explain about my topic in my blog. Lol 🙃
Sikin Nuratika mengatakan…
Hi Siska! Thanks for the compliment. I do hope that I can give a good answer on each question. 🤗
Fransiska Gan mengatakan…
You're welcome Sikin. I guess you are one of the critical personalities here. Thank you for sharing your knowledge in all the questions or suggestions before. 😇😇
Sikin Nuratika mengatakan…
So sweet of you Fransiska. Thank you too because you share your knowledge on my blog and also on another blog. I hope we will always like this. 😍😘😍
Fransiska Gan mengatakan…
I hope too we always like this Sikin. Critics but also build each other will make us closer and keep doing positive attitude and comments to others. 🤗🤗😘😘
Veronica Saragi mengatakan…
Hi dude. Dont action like you are the most clever in this world.😁😏

Postingan populer dari blog ini